Joe Harris, Workshops, Sept 2012

Hey, everyone,

This is kind of a cheater post, since I am forwarding old rather than new work.

But . . . last fall, Jess Restaino invited me to come up to MSU to work with teachers at MSU. I remember my visit very fondly—not least because, after the workshop, Jess, Caroline Dadas, and I went to see The Boss in the Meadowlands. Cathartic. Inspiring.

But, to retreat to the mundane, I am attaching here the slides from the two workshops I offered last fall, in the hope that they might spark some memories, reflections, questions, counter-arguments, tirades, polemics, whatever. I look forward to hearing from you!

Accidental Writing Teacher

Teaching a Metalanguage

Listening and Responding to Our Students

The other day I found myself with an unexpected visitor casually observing one of my composition classes, and no lesson plan.

Well, I had a lesson plan; the second draft of an essay was due that day, and I had a revision activity planned for my students.  But in response to my casual question of “How are these essays coming?” at the beginning of class, my students hit me with a barrage of complaint:  they were stuck, they didn’t know what else to say, they didn’t know how to organize their ideas, they weren’t sure if they were answering the question in the assignment, they had only written one page because they kept starting over.  So I decided to put off my planned revision exercise and try to spend part of class time working through my students’ difficulties with the essay.  I took a poll of the class, and it turned out that almost everyone was struggling with organization and introductions.  Together we reviewed what they had learned about introductions and made a checklist for a good introduction.  Then several students volunteered to read their introductions to the class, and the class evaluated whether or not the introductions met the criteria on the checklist, then gave the writers feedback on how to improve.  Together they determined, for instance, that yes, Mary’s introduction had a “hook,” but it wasn’t very effective, and she could make it more compelling by adding a second, contradictory clause to the sentence.  Next, the students exchanged drafts and did a quick peer review focusing solely on introductions, using the checklist we had developed.

At some point, my original lesson plan was entirely scrapped, and we spent the remainder of class creating a sample outline for an essay on the assigned topic, after which the students had a little time to make their own informal outlines to help organize their essays.  Of course, I could have gone ahead with my planned activity, and it probably would have benefited the students in some ways as well, but instead, I chose to let my students assess what they needed most, and to respond to those needs, even though it meant coming up with a new 75-minute lesson plan on the spot, in front of an observer.

I once heard a colleague compare teaching to performing live improvisational comedy:  you might go in with a general plan of what you’re going to do, but you can never predict how the other people involved will react, and once you’ve lost your audience, you have to work twice as hard to get them back…if you ever do.

I think my colleague had a valid point.  There are risks involved in classroom teaching, precisely because we can’t predict what will happen each day when we stand at the front of a room full of fifteen or twenty (or more) distinct individuals.  As a result of this risk factor, it can be tempting to plan obsessively and stick to those plans pretty rigidly.  I think, though, that the most successful teachers are those who are willing to cultivate a more flexible and responsive approach in the classroom.  Not only does this allow for us to address the real needs that students are able to identify and articulate, it also creates an atmosphere in which students can feel valued and develop a sense of their own authority as writers.  If I trust my students to figure out what they need the most help with, and respond by providing that help, the message I hope it sends to them is that they have the ability to assess their writing and take concrete steps to improve it.  I think this was demonstrated by the active role my students took the other day in creating our class checklist for effective introductions, and thoughtfully critiquing each others’ work based on this checklist.  In a way, it was more work for me (and a lot more talking on the fly), but the class is not about me, it’s about my students.  I don’t think I’ve ever met a composition instructor who would disagree (at least, not that I knew of), but I don’t think it hurts to remind ourselves of this point every once in a while.

To this end, I not only come to class prepared to ditch a lesson plan now and then; I also try to encourage a fair amount of reflection by my students.  Here are some specific things I do in class to help with this goal:

Post-writes—Every time a final draft of an essay is due, before I collect it from my students, I have them spend up to ten minutes writing about their work on that essay.  I ask them to tell me what they liked or disliked about the topic, what they found challenging about the essay, what parts of their essays they feel like they did well, what parts they may feel less confident about, and if there is any section or aspect of the essay that they’d like me to pay particular attention to when I’m grading it.  I collect these post-writes along with the essays, and read them before I begin grading each essay.

Unit post-mortems—As we are wrapping up a learning unit, I will often ask my students to tell me what they thought of it.  Were they interested in the topic?  Was it hard to talk about?  What did they think of the readings?  Would they advise me to use the unit again in a future course?  I take my students’ responses with a grain of salt, but I do think about them and use the general gist of their feedback to help me revise my syllabi and assignments from time to time.

Debates—This is something new I’ve tried this semester, and so far, it’s worked very well.  I give my students a basic debate format (opening statements, rebuttals, cross-examination, second statements/rebuttals, closing statements), set time limits, create teams and a panel of judges, give them a question to debate, assign a time-keeper…and surrender responsibility.  One of the “rules” of the debate is that I’m not allowed to comment in any way while it is ongoing, and sometimes it’s incredibly hard not to say anything, but when the students are totally responsible for keeping the debate going, they really get into the discussion, and the “judges” tend to take their role very seriously.  I’m finding it’s a great way to take the focus off of me and to let my students explore the nuances of a topic on their own.

Immediate feedback—Sometimes, for whatever reason, a lesson or activity that I’ve planned completely flops.  Now matter how much enthusiasm I muster at the chalkboard or from my spot in the circle, my students just sit and stare.  When this happens, if the class doesn’t perk up within a reasonable time frame, I will stop what I’m doing and ask them directly, “What is the problem?”  Sometimes it might be that no one did the reading, or the weather is truly awful and everyone wants to go back to bed, and there’s not much I can do about that except tell them to sit up and make an effort.  But sometimes, it might be that the students didn’t understand the assignment, or that they did the reading but feel uncomfortable discussing it, and just talking about that discomfort can help to get the discussion started.  Even if the lesson is falling flat because of factors that are beyond my control, I’ve generally found that simply by stopping and asking my students what’s going on, I’m able to get a better response from them.  I don’t know whether this is because of the novelty of the occurrence or because it shows them that I care about their engagement with the material, but if it works, I’ll take it.

Balancing our students’ varying and somewhat unpredictable needs with our program’s requirements and our own carefully laid plans is one of the challenges of teaching, but listening and responding to our students can also be one of the most rewarding aspects of what we do.  What are some of your strategies for keeping the classroom focused on the students’ needs?

Focus on Revision

Over the next couple of weeks, our FYW classes will transition into portfolio mode, which means even more focused attention on revision. For many instructors, revision is the cornerstone of the entire course and the focus is always on teaching writing as revision. For some, this time in the classroom is a welcomed shift that allows for the space to dig in and, as Adrienne Rich suggests, look at student writing with “fresh eyes” (18). For other instructors, this is a dreaded time filled with frustration, and even self-doubt, as the focus of class planning becomes convincing students to see revision as something much larger than simply crossing t’s and dotting i’s.

Whether you welcome or despise this aspect of teaching writing, this is the perfect time of year to open up a program-wide discussion about the role that revision plays in our classrooms and to share our challenges, successes, frustrations, and triumphs. How do you define revision? What experiences inform students’ understanding of revision? What works best in your classroom and why?  Peer review, teacher comments, conferences? Do you agree with Nancy Sommer’s argument, in “Responding to Student Writing,” that teachers “need to show students how to seek, in the possibility of revision, the dissonances of discovery – to show them through our comments why new choices would positively change their texts, and thus show them the potential for development implicit in their own writing” (156)? Does our current program model allow for real revision to happen? In what ways can we imagine revision as a community practice?

Just as we are asking students to re-see in their own writing, instructors might also seize this moment to consider how to engage in a similar process of revision when making choices about classroom activities and portfolio expectations. How is instructor participation in the process crucial to the success of revision in our classrooms? Are you going to hand out the same tired peer review sheet one more time or is it time to challenge yourself to try something new? In these last few weeks, can you both motivate students and at the same time inspire your own teaching?

In an effort to facilitate the sharing of ideas and to continue to build community within our program, the Mentoring and Collaboration committee is offering an informal workshop in Dickson 179  on Wednesday, April 10th from 2:30-3:30ish. Come share your assignments, ask for guidance, and offer up your questions, frustrations, and successes.

Hope to see you there!

Works Cited

Rich, Adrienne. “When We Dead Awaken: Writing as Re-Vision.” College English 34.1 (1972): 18-30.

Sommers, Nancy. “Responding to Student Writing.” College Composition and Communication 33.2 (May 1982): 148-156.

Making grades work for you

As my good buddy Lord Tennyson (almost) wrote, in spring a young writing teacher’s fancy lightly turns to thoughts of grading. Or something like that. With the end of the semester approaching, papers piling up, students turning pale/red/purple/mahogany when you return graded essays, frantic emails from some said students about grades, and reminders from the university about when/how grades are to be submitted, it’s difficult not to have grading on the mind.

The pleasure most writing teachers feel while grading essays probably stands in inverse proportion to the large amount of time we spend engaged in it. Personally, while dealing with them is hardly one of my favorite parts of the job, I do think that grades can be a quite useful tool for the classroom, not only in the area of assessment but also to the end of motivating students. To enhance that effect, I believe that it is also possible to minimize one of the elements of grading that many instructors hate—student complaints about them. While my students would certainly vouch for the fact that I am not an easy grader, I rarely get a genuine complaint, which makes it much easier to use grading as I want. Here is a fairly random listing of approaches and tactics I use to such ends.

Continue reading


Welcome to the First-Year Writing Program blog, maintained by the Mentoring and Collaboration committee. We hope that this blog will provide a useful forum for discussing opinions, concerns and questions about pedagogical and other academic issues.